Slow Motion Video of Pneumatic Antenna Launcher

I have made one of these launchers.  Here is a video I found on YouTue that demonstrates the action in slow motion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIU_LVRdvW4

Great You Tube Video Explaining SWR and Antenna Systems

SWR and Antenna Systems

Where does all that RF go anyway? by W7CI

This is a rather long post.  All the credit goes to W7CI

---The Reflection Section--- The purpose of this section is to explain what happens when un-used energy comes back down the coax from the antenna.

Here are some simple truths that you probably knew before you got here, but when they are all put together, you will have 7 different things happening.

It is a little difficult to keep track of all 7 things that are happening, but this section will try to help you do that. Please go slow here. Take breaks if you would like to.

It helped me to draw diagrams of all this. Please feel free to stop and grab some paper to draw a diagram or two, or more.

This page is the most difficult page to understand of all the pages in this site. It uses high school algebra but I show you every move. Please feel free to skip all the math stuff, but please read the discussion parts so you can learn what is really going on.


The simple truths start here.

Your SWR meter reads the reverse energy in a coax, and converts that number into a value called the "Standing Wave Ratio". That number has very little meaning. The

value is when you convert that number back into what it measured in the first place, which is the percent of returning energy. That is why you need a SWR meter.

You should always use an antenna tuner. It goes near your rig, in the shack. Its duty is to match your antenna and coax to the impedance of your rig, not to change the SWR in the coax that goes from the antenna down to the antenna tuner. Many radios have tuners built in. Some tuners are automatic.

Electrial energy moves forward and backward in a coaxial cable and in ladder line. (Everything I tell you about Coax is also true for ladder line, except that ladder line has far less loss.)

Electrical energy moves forward because the generator (your rig) pushes it toward the antenna.

It moves backwards because the antenna can not absorb all the energy, so the un-absorbed energy goes back down the coax. (The absorbed energy is converted into Electro-Magnetic energy and is transmitted out into space.)

The reflected energy will be (re-reflected)* when it reaches the tuner or the tuned circuit in the output stage of the transmitter. NO LOSSES happen at the refelection points, and your rig will not blow up because refelected energy got into the tuned circuit.
OK, nothing is perfect, and there will be a very very small amount of resistance in the coil and capacitor in the tuner which will create a very small loss, but it is truly tiny. (0.01 dB is a good estimate) This is absolutely true, Honest!

* I need to interrupt this discussion to explain a bit about the term "re-reflection". This interruption has been added after receiving an email from Cecil, W5DXP. He is an absolute expert when it comes to energy moving from place to place in a coax or ladder line. He has both experience and education in this field. He wants you to know that the term "re-reflection" is not technically accurate. The reason it is not accurate is because the complete process in the tuner involves superposition, interference, and wave cancellation, and not simply re-reflection. I did not mention this in the first writing because I wanted to keep this as simple as possible. I am including this information now because Cecil, W5DXP is correct and if you understand those concepts, it may make understanding this material easier. It also may let other high power Ph.D folks know that I am trying to keep this as simple as possible while trying to be as correct as possible.You can look him up on Google or visit his web site information at
www.mellesgriot.com/products/optics/oc_2_1.htm
or at micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/interference/waveinteractions/index.html

OK, back to the original subject.

There are usually two coaxial cables between the transmitter and the antenna.
                                       _____   _______
__________                   |SWR | |Antenna|                            ________
|Transmitter|   Coax #1  |meter| |   tuner  |        Coax #2      |Antenna|
Coax #1 is usually quite short, and coax #2 is far longer because it goes from your desk up to the antenna.

Controversy ahead. The following information is absolutely correct, no matter what you have heard from your engineering professors or your favorite ham radio magazine.  I know you can read many articles that disagree with what I have written here, but I have some important people who agree with me.  The two most important people who agree with me are

L. B. Cebik, W4RNL (SK) who has written many articles for the ARRL on transmission lines and antenna tuners.
http://www.cebik.com and M. Walt Maxwell, W2DU who has written the book "Reflections:Transmission Lines and Antennas". This book was published by the ARRL. At the time of this writing (April 2010), Walt is 91 years old, and is still active and answers his email regularly.
While not a person, just as important is The ARRL Antenna Book, published by the ARRL.

Note from the author : This statement is not to imply that L. B. Cebik, W4RNLand M. Walt Maxwell, W2DU have read this web site and sent me a message telling me that they approve of what is written here. What it does mean is that nearly 100% of what is here comes from what they have written in books or on the interenet. I did not create these thoughts, but I report them in as simple a manner as I can. Naturally, I agree with them and believe them to be absolutely correct.

The reason this is controversial is because so many people have been told a different story. When you hear any story over and over again, it becomes part of the "common knowledge" of the culture, and it tends to be condsidered the truth, even when it is clearly not true at all. That is what has happened here.

This is the last, but long, simple truth: 

The antenna tuner adjusts the electrical length of the antenna and coax #2 so that the reflected energy has the exactly correct phase to bere-reflected at the antenna tuner. When the tuner is correctly tuned, no energy gets back into coax #1. An SWR meter is usually placed into coax #1 as a tuning aid, to measure the reflected energy. That meter will show an SWR of 1:1 when the reflected energy has been 100% re-reflected.

Coax #2 still has reflected waves because of the mis-match between coax #2 and the antenna, but those reflections will be re-reflected at the tuner and they will add to the transmitter energy output. It may seem strange that the system is resonant and still has reflections due to mismatched impedance, but the coax and antenna are not the same impedance.
Actually, except for the losses in the coax, 100% of the energy that leaves the transmitter will be radiated out of the antenna, no matter how high the SWR, because of the re-reflection. A high SWR will create a higher loss in the coax because a higher amount of energy travels backwards in the coax. This enegy going backwards is subject to the same losses as the forward moving energy.

The tuner provides a conjugate match (equal magnitude but opposite reactance) for the system from the antenna tuner, through coax #2, to the tip of the antenna ends. This makes the antenna appear to be resonant, and coax #2 becomes the correct electrical length for re-reflections to happen.

Many authors have stated that an antenna tuner tunes coax #1, but has no effect on coax #2 or the antenna. That is not a good explaination. A much better explaination is that when the antenna and coax #2 are tuned, the tuner can re-refelect the reflected energy from the antenna. That is one important reason refelected energy does not get into coax #1. The other reason is that since coax #2 is now without reactance at the matching point, the impedance of coax #1 (50 Ω) exactly matches the impedance of coax #2 (50 Ω) so no refelections happen at the front end of the tuner and all the transmitter energy gets through to the tuner and into coax #2.
This is a very sticky point. According to M. Walter Maxwell in his book Reflections:Transmission Lines and Antennas, published by the ARRL, on Page 13 - 4, he says " The antenna tuner really does tune the antenna to resonance, in spite of opinions to the contrary of those who are unaware of the priciples of conjugate matching. The tuner obtains a match, by which all reactances throughout the entire antenna system are canceled, including that of the off-resonant antenna, thereby tuning it to resonance."

An even better way to discribe what happens is to point out that the specific spot called the "matching point" is where the impedance is 50 Ohms with zero reactance and it exactly matches the impedance of coax #1 at that point. There is really no need to claim that coax #1 or coax #2 have been tuned, because it is the "matching point" that is connected to coax #1, not the complete length of coax #2.

Please be patient here. This explaination has lots of steps, and each one is critical to understanding what really happens in the coax of an antenna system that is not perfectly matched.

This is the end of the simple truths.

The explanations are below.

There are 7 things you need to know. First, I will list the 7 things, and then each one will be explained in detail.
The reason this following information is not well known is because most people do not take the time to understand each step that follows.

Each step is easy if you go slow and draw things out on paper. You will gain quite a lot of understanding of what really happens to a signal in a coax if you go slow, and have patience. Do not read quickly. Do not continue on if even one little thing is not clear to you. You will be proud of yourself if you learn this.

1) Reflections happen at the coax - antenna connection and they also happen at the coax - tuner connection. The last part of this statement seems to be missing from most discussions of SWR and mis-matched conditions.  This is why a lot of people think that refelected power gets into the radio and does damage. That does not happen! 
** What does kill radios is explained at the very bottom of this page. **

2) These reflections do not cause energy loss. All losses are due to the coax itself.

3) Energy moving backwards in the coax is subject to the exact same losses as energy moving in the forward direction.

4) The amount of energy reflected at the coax - antenna connection depends on the amount of impedance mis-match (read SWR) between the antenna and the coax. The greater the mis-match, the greater the reflection. 

5) The amount of energy re-reflected at the coax - tuner connection is 100% of the energy that gets there, but not all the energy that was originally reflected gets back to the coax - tuner connection. There will be losses in the coax. All the reflected energy that reaches the coax - tuner connection is re-reflected back into the coax headed for the antenna. (Yup, another lossy trip in the coax.) 

6) The re-reflected energy will be in phase with the generator so the two signals will add. This can create more forward power in the coax than the transmitter is actually producing. It is possible to measure 125 Watts forward power from a 100 Watt transmitter because the re-reflected power adds to the transmitter power

7) Coax losses are the only losses in the whole system. These losses can be significant, but they are the ONLY losses in the antenna system. If you have been paying attention, you know that this last step is just a re-statment of other steps above.

Here come the details! Do not skip this section. It is full of math, but you
                                                                                                                                                        _{_____} 
can do it. Use a calculator that has X ² and √ X.

1) Reflections happen at the coax - antenna connection, and again at the coax - tuner connection.

This means that energy will zoom up the coax between the antenna and the tuner and some of it will return down the coax. The "lost" energy is both lost in the coax, and radiated out into space by the antenna.

Another detail must be intorduced here. Every time the signal is reflected ( or re-reflected) a 180 degree phase shift happens to the current. This means that the current turns around and goes the other way, and it also turns upside down. Both things happen at the reflection points.

Let me say this again. In the case where the impedance of the antenna is greater than the impedance of the coax,        [ Z_Antenna > Z _coax ]  the reflected voltage will just turn around and go in the other direction, but the reflected current will become upside down as it also travels in reverse. This means that the forward voltage and reverse voltage are in phase with each other, but the forward current and reflected current are 180 degrees out of phase with each other. When the reverse ( and upside down ) current reaches the tuner, another 180 degree phase reversal and direction change will happen.

Now the re-reflected current is back in phase with the generator current, and the forward and reverse voltage are also in phase.This phase reversal is a good thing because it allows the forward and reverse current to ADD together when the re-reflection happens at the tuner.  Try drawing a picture of this. Be patient. Go slow. 

2) These reflections do not cause energy loss.

Energy losses are caused by heating ( I² * R ) or radiation, but not by reflection. The law of conservation of energy tells us that what ever goes into a reflection will come out if there is no radiation and no heating. 

3) Energy moving in a coax will have losses due to leakage and ( I² * R ) heating.

These losses are well documented by the companies that make the coax. One of my favorite places to find the losses in different kinds of coax is http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm They have a calculator that will help you convert the dB losses into actual Watts for a better understanding of what is happening. You will find it about half way down the page.

Follow the zig - zag path of power!

Here is an example of a typical coax with its typical loss in an antenna system with a SWR of 1.4 to 1. Go to the web site listed directly above and scroll about half way down the page to the calculator. Press the little "down arrow" and pick Belden 9913 (RG-8). It is a high quality coax used by many amateurs. Do not change anything else yet. When you have chosen the Belden 9913 coax, press the "calculate" button. 

If you have done this correctly, the calculator will tell you that Belden 9913 has a dB loss of only 0.388 dB and that calculates out to 91.461 Watts output from the coax if you put 100 Watts in to it.
Where did the rest of that power go? 
It was lost to leakage inside the coax and to ( I² * R ) heating.

How much of that 91.461 Watts will be used by the antenna and how much will be refelected? 
The reflection coefficient is a number that tells you the percentage of reflection at the antenna - coax connection. The symbol "p" is used to represent this reflection coefficient. The math is easy to do.

p = ( SWR -1 ) / ( SWR + 1 ) We started by assuming that the SWR is 1.4 to 1. Use that 1.4 value to fill in the formula.
p = ( 1.4 - 1 ) / ( 1.4 + 1 ) = 0.4 / 2.4 = 0.166
The reflection coefficient is used for voltage, currrent, and when squared, it is used for power.
Since the reflection coefficient is 0.166 in this example, the voltage reflected will be 16.6% of what arrives from the generator, and the current reflected will also be 16.6% of what arrives from the generator. The power that is reflected will be the square of the reflection coefficient.

To find out how much power is reflected, you will need to use the following formula.
Reflected Power = p² times the Power available
Reflected Power = (.166)² times 91.461 Watts.
Reflected Power = (0.02775) Times 91.461 Watts
Reflected Power = 2.54 Watts
This means that 2.54 Watts of the forward power will be reflected back down the coax toward the tuner, and the rest ( 91.461 W - 2.54 W = 88.921 Watts) 88.921 Watts will be used by the antenna and be radiated into space.
====================================
Try drawing a picture of this. Be patient. Go slow.
Is it break time yet? 
====================================
The power that reached the coax - antenna connection was 91.461 Watts and 97.25% of that power will be radiated into space, leaving 2.75% to be reflected back down the coax. Both of these percentages come from the Reflection Coefficient that has been squared.
   (Reflection Coefficient)² = (0.166)² = .0275, which means that 2.75 % will be reflected.
   Power used by the antenna = 100% - 2.75 % = 97.25%

How much power will be radiated by the antenna? 
The antenna will radiate 88.921 Watts into space.
This number will get slightly larger after the reflected power is returned to the antenna, but for now, during the first cycle, only 88.921 Watts are transmitted.
How much power is headed toward the tuner? 
Only 91.461 Watts was available at the antenna - coax connection, and 2.75 percent of that will be reflected back down the coax toward the tuner.
( 91.461 Watts times 2.75% = 2.54 Watts ) 2.54 Watts will be returned to the coax to go back to the tuner.
How much power gets to the tuner? http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm 
We must use the calculator again. Put 2.54 Watts in the place of the 100 Watts just above the "calculate" button. Press the "calculate" button.
Do it now please. Notice that 2.323 Watts gets to the tuner and the rest was lost to heat and leakage.
5) How much power is re-reflected at the tuner? 
100 % of the reflected power that gets to the tuner will be re-reflected. In this case, the power that is re-reflected is 2.323 Watts. This 2.323 Watts now starts its way back to the antenna.
6) The re-reflected energy will be in phase with the generator so the two signals will add. [Note: If the two signals were not exactly in phase, the addition still happens, but the method is messy, and the result is not the same. This would be the case if the antenna was not exactly tuned to the operating frequency as it is in this example or if an antenna tuner was not correctly adjusted.]
The generator is producing 100 Watts and now it will have an additional 2.323 Watts added to it, for a total of 102.323 Watts heading for the antenna.

This is the official end of the first cycle of the generator. This first cycle started with a 100 Watt signal leaving the generator, but only 88.921 Watts was transmitted. The total loss so far due to heating and leakage was

( 100W - 91.46 W = 8.55W ) 8.55 Watts on the trip up to the antenna, and
( 2.54 W - 2.32 W = 0.217 W ) 0.217 Watts loss on the way back down the coax.
This makes a total of ( 8.55 W + 0.217 W = 8.76 W ) 8.76 Watts actually lost in the form of heat and leakage.

There are still 2.32 Watts stored in the coax( and tuner) about to be added to the generator power.
All the power is accounted for. This is important because it helps you realize this explaination is correct.

---

That's a lot of information. What is the actual result ?
What's the Score? 

Input Power - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 W
Loss of power going up the Coax- - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.55 W
Power reaching the Antenna - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91.46 W
Power Radiated by the Antenna- - - - - - - - - - - - - 88.91 W
Reflected Power returned to the Coax- - - - - - - - - 2.54 W
Loss of Power going back down the Coax - - - - - - - 0.217 W
Power that arrives at the Tuner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.32 W
Radiated power evenually evens out to - - - - - - - - 91 W.
(after about 5 cycles)

This shows where the power is lost, and what is radiated. This is far too much information, but it is necessary to tell the whole story truthfully.
As you know, this is only the first cycle.Make a diagram of all this information so you can see where all these numbers fit in. That will help you understand this.
The power that is still in the coax (and tuner) will add to the generator power which will add a little to the output and add to the losses. This will continue for a few cycles until the system settles out to finally produce 91 Watts radiated power.

Finally, take a look at what happens when the SWR is high and what happens when the coax loss is great.

First, lets look at what happens when the SWR is high (SWR = 3)
This uses the same 50 Ω coax as before.


                                                                                    SWR = 1.4                     SWR = 3
Input Power - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- - - - - - - - 100 W                         100 W
Loss of power going up the Coax - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.55 W                         8.55 W
Power reaching the Antenna- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 91.46 W                      91.46 W
Power Radiated by the Antenna - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 88.91 W                       68.59 W ←
Reflected Power returned to the Coax - - - - ---- - - - - - 2.6 W                         22.86 W
Loss of Power going back down the Coax - - - - - - - - 0.217 W                       1.95 W
Power that arrives at the Tuner - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - 2.32 W                       20.9 W
Radiated power eventually settles out at - - --- - - - - - - 91.0 W                        86.7 W←Even when there is a high SWR, the final power output is nearly the same.

SWR is not a killer at all.

---

This is the same SWR = 1.4, but the COAX now has a loss of 2.5 dB (Belden 8216) which is Rg - 174. 

                                                                        Belden 9913                Belden 8216
                                                                Coax loss = .388 dB         Coax loss = 2.5 dB
Input Power- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 W                         100 W
Loss of power going up the Coax- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.55 W                      43.7 W
Power reaching the Antenna - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91.46 W                      56.2 W
Power Radiated by the Antenna- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88.91 W                      54.6 W
Reflected Power returned to the Coax- - - - - - - - - - 2.54 W                        1.56 W
Loss of Power going back down the Coax- - - - - - - - 0.217 W                      0.68 W
Power that arrives at the Tuner- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.32 W                         .87 W
Radiated power eventually settles out at- - - - - - - - - 91 W                         55.1 W ← 

These losses are terrible! The coax losses have ruined the output power!!

Finally we have come to the very last subject on this page.

So, why do people think they can blow up their rigs or linear amplifiers when there is a high SWR on the antenna? 

Because that can happen, but it is not due to the reflected power!
There is a totally different reason.
A high SWR on an antenna probably means that the antenna is not tuned to the frequency that is being used. This, in turn, means that the antenna has some inductive or capacitive reactance that is de-tuning the final amplifier. De-tuned final amplifiers draw far too much current and can burn up. The rig or linear amplifier will have to be re-tuned to avoid creating too much heat.
Many linears and nearly all tube amplifiers have some tuning knobs that allow you to "dip the plate current" or adjust the SWR by adjusting something on the front of the device.
Transistor rigs usually do not have any tuning adjustments. To avoid the extra heat created when running a de-tuned amplifier, there is a protection circuit that will significantly reduce the output power if the SWR is high.

---

 The conclusion section. Finally we are at the conclusion section. I hope you have seen that . . . . .

High SWR at the transmitter can ruin that rig because the final amplifier is de-tuned. Using an antenna tuner will tune the rig back to where it should be.

High SWR at the antenna will not significantly reduce your power (if you are using an antenna tuner)

- - -unless - - -

• you are not using a tuner and
• there is a circuit inside the rig that shuts down power when it sees a high SWR.

High loss coax can really reduce your output power. A coax with a 3 dB loss will suck up half the power, allowing the antenna to radiate the other half.

Second Time as Net Control for The Blue Ridge 2m Net

This past Saturday May 17 - was my second opportunity to be net control for the Blue Ridge Amateur Radio Society - 2 meter Net.  There were 53 check-ins and three ragchewers - Bob (forget his call sign), NOTR - Tom an K4SUG - Ray.

Ham Radio on Last Man Standing (ABC)

In an episode which aired in mid-March, the hit ABC comedy Last Man Standing -- starring Tim Allen as Mike Baxter, KA0XTT -- will prominently feature scenes with cast members using Amateur Radio. This episode will be the first episode to feature Amateur Radio since the middle of the show’s first season.

According to Last Man Standing Producer John Amodeo, NN6JA, the episode called “The Fight” will feature several of the regular cast members talking on the radios. “I can’t say much about the episode right now,” Amodeo told the ARRL, “But this episode has the most significant use of Amateur Radio in a TV comedy since Herman Munster, W6XRL4, got his ham license.” Fans of 1960s television will remember the episode of The Munsters (originally aired January 21, 1965) when Herman, on his ham radio, overheard children using walkie-talkies who were pretending to be Martians.

“In addition to the original KA0XTT station in Mike Baxter’s work office, viewers will get to see Mike’s ham shack in the basement of his home,” Amodeo explained. “A cast member will also be calling in from a portable HF radio while hiking along the Amazon.” The ARRL provided many of the awards -- including 5 Band DXCC, 5 Band Worked All States, 5 Band Worked All Continents and VUCC -- that are on Mike Baxter’s home shack wall. The episode, which was filmed February 12, will also feature Richard Karn. Fans of Allen’s former show Home Improvement will remember Karn as Al Borland.

N3ZN Key Arrived Today

The N3ZN SL-jr made by Tony Baleno arrived today.  The package would have survived a 2000 foot drop (exaggerated for effect) - it was so well done.  Tony does not take any short cuts.  A picture of the key is behind this blogs title.  The key spacing has been preset for a very light touch.  I have not tried any adjustments yet.

Details on My Quest for DXCC QRP

Radios used to make the contacts:
Yaesu FT897: 4
Elecraft K2: 47
Elecraft KX1: 8
Elecraft KX3: 42

Some Statistics on antennas used:
Longest Contact: Rodriguez Island 10090 miles with the K2 with ZS6BKW
Shortest Contact" Canada at 692 miles with the K2

Almost 90% of the contacts were made on 3 amateur bands: 40m, 30m and 20m

Three antennas were used at various times - The Par End Fed Z - multiband end fed dipole, the full size G5RV, and the ZS6BKW.  The latter 2 are multi-band dipoles fed with 450 ohm window lines.  The average distance for a contact on the Par antenna was 4433 miles.  The ZS6BKW outdistanced the G5RV by about 310 miles on average with the G5RV averaging 3544 miles/contact while the ZS6BKW average 3854 per contact.  The contact with Rodriguez Island skewed the average to the ZS6BKW.  Here is the complete list.

Callsign	QSO Date	Entity Name	RIG	Distance	Bearing	Mode	Antenna	Band
LX7I	19-Feb-11	Luxembourg	FT897	4381	46	CW	G5RV	40
OE5FBL	3-Jun-11	Austria	FT897	4761	46	CW	G5RV	20
FR5HA	4-Jun-11	Reunion I.	FT897	9700	82	CW	G5RV	20
CO4RM	8-Jun-11	Cuba	FT897	872	171	CW	G5RV	40
LS1D	11-Jun-11	Argentina	K2	4863	166	CW	G5RV	20
HK3O	11-Jun-11	Colombia	K2	2067	164	CW	G5RV	40
YN2MJ	11-Jun-11	Nicaragua	K2	1470	188	CW	G5RV	40
VE3RTU	3-Jul-11	Canada	K2	693	12	CW	G5RV	40
PV8ADI	8-Jul-11	Brazil	K2	3584	143	CW	G5RV	40
IR2C	8-Jul-11	Italy	K2	4879	51	CW	G5RV	20
LZ9W	9-Jul-11	Bulgaria	K2	5413	46	CW	G5RV	20
GR2HQ	10-Jul-11	England	K2	4013	45	CW	G5RV	40
KH6ZM	15-Jul-11	Hawaii	K2	4547	278	CW	G5RV	40
R5ZZ	24-Jul-11	European Russia	KX1	5260	30	CW	G5RV	20
UA9FGJ	29-Jul-11	Asiatic Russia	K2	5433	358	CW	G5RV	20
LY53SOP	29-Jul-11	Lithuania	K2	4864	35	CW	G5RV	40
GM0ADX	30-Jul-11	Scotland	K2	3844	40	CW	G5RV	20
DL5ZBA	13-Aug-11	Federal Rep of Germany	KX1	4515	44	CW	G5RV	40
MD0CCE	13-Aug-11	Isle of Man	K2	3870	44	CW	G5RV	20
SP3GXH	3-Nov-11	Poland	K2	4806	40	CW	G5RV	40
OV1CDX	4-Nov-11	Denmark	KX1	4379	39	CW	G5RV	40
K7RL	7-Nov-11	USA	K2	2296	206	CW	G5RV	20
H18A	13-Nov-11	Dominican Republic	K2	1241	143	CW	G5RV	40
OK1DMZ	22-Nov-11	Czech Republic	K2	4781	43	CW	G5RV	12
P40L	27-Nov-11	Aruba	K2	1665	150	CW	G5RV	20
C5A	27-Nov-11	The Gambia	K2	4311	92	CW	G5RV	20
EA8BVP	4-Dec-11	Canary Is.	K2	3892	76	CW	G5RV	15
VP9/K2XX	6-Dec-11	Bermuda	K2	1006	92	CW	G5RV	30
V25RV	5-Jan-12	Antigua & Barbuda	K2	1709	128	CW	G5RV	30
V31JP	7-Jan-12	Belize	K2	1245	201	CW	G5RV	30
OA1F	7-Jan-12	Peru	K2	3063	172	CW	G5RV	20
5B4AHL	28-Jan-12	Cyprus	K2	6080	48	CW	G5RV	15
PJ4LS	4-Feb-12	Bonaire	K2	1737	147	SSB	G5RV	20
YY5RTX	11-Feb-12	Venezuela	K2	2064	147	CW	G5RV	40
PA6Z	12-Feb-12	Netherlands	K2	4303	44	CW	G5RV	30
F5IN	23-Feb-12	France	KX1	4312	51	CW	G5RV	40
HA9RT	25-Feb-12	Hungary	K2	5012	44	CW	G5RV	40
9A7R	26-Feb-12	Croatia	KX1	4914	48	CW	G5RV	40
J38A	5-Mar-12	Grenada	KX1	1979	135	CW	G5RV	30
ZF2AH	14-Mar-12	Cayman Is.	KX1	1016	177	CW	G5RV	40
6Y0A	18-Mar-12	Jamaica	K2	1126	165	CW	G5RV	30
XF1AA	18-Mar-12	Mexico	KX1	1387	245	CW	G5RV	30
VP5/W5CW	21-Mar-12	Turks & Caicos Is.	K2	1046	141	CW	G5RV	20
FG8NY	24-Mar-12	Guadeloupe	K2	1765	129	CW	G5RV	30
YO6LV	27-Mar-12	Romania	K2	5276	43	CW	G5RV	40
V44KAI	28-Mar-12	St. Kitts & Nevis	K2	1649	129	CW	G5RV	40
SM51O	9-Jun-12	Sweden	K2	4393	32	CW	G5RV	40
KL7AA	24-Jun-12	Alaska	K2	3588	328	CW	G5RV	20
KP4ES	24-Jun-12	Puerto Rico	K2	1446	135	CW	G5RV	40
ES5RR	11-Aug-12	Estonia	KX3	4780	32	CW	G5RV	20
YT3M	11-Aug-12	Serbia	KX3	5197	46	CW	G5RV	20
S53M	11-Aug-12	Slovenia	K2	4833	47	CW	G5RV	20
UW5Q	11-Aug-12	Ukraine	KX3	5301	38	CW	G5RV	20
S02R	11-Aug-12	Western Sahara	KX3	4072	79	CW	G5RV	20
LA1J	16-Aug-12	Norway	KX3	4224	34	CW	G5RV	40
EA6NB	11-Sep-12	Balearic Is.	KX3	4553	57	CW	ZS6BKW	40
ZS1JX	11-Sep-12	South Africa	KX3	8080	108	CW	ZS6BKW	80
KP2/K5WE	24-Sep-12	US Virgin Is.	KX3	1547	132	CW	ZS6BKW	40
EW7LO	27-Sep-12	Belarus	KX3	5067	35	CW	ZS6BKW	40
FY8PE	27-Sep-12	French Guiana	KX3	1784	132	CW	ZS6BKW	20
OP4F	28-Sep-12	Belgium	KX3	4314	45	CW	ZS6BKW	15
CU4ARG	29-Sep-12	Azores	KX3	3019	67	CW	ZS6BKW	40
8P6DR	29-Sep-12	Barbados	KX3	2012	130	CW	ZS6BKW	40
ZA/OK1DX	1-Oct-12	Albania	KX3	5268	49	CW	PAR-3015	30
HC2SL	2-Oct-12	Ecuador	KX3	2455	174	CW	ZS6BKW	40
ER1DA	2-Oct-12	Moldova	KX3	5392	41	CW	PAR-3015	30
5N7M	2-Oct-12	Nigeria	KX3	5810	82	CW	ZS6BKW	80
TG9ADM	4-Oct-12	Guatemala	KX3	1378	204	CW	PAR-3015	30
EI3KG	5-Oct-12	Ireland	K2	3745	45	CW	PAR-3015	30
HP1/IZ6BRN	5-Oct-12	Panama	KX3	1731	175	CW	PAR-3015	30
IS0IGV	6-Oct-12	Sardinia	KX3	4814	54	CW	ZS6BKW	40
D3AA	11-Oct-12	Angola	K2	7289	95	CW	PAR-3015	30
TI2KWN	11-Oct-12	Costa Rica	K2	1662	185	CW	ZS6BKW	40
E71A	12-Oct-12	Bosnia Herzegovina	K2	5043	48	CW	PAR-3015	30
PZ1DV	12-Oct-12	Suriname	K2	2660	135	CW	PAR-3015	30
4X130RISHON	13-Oct-12	Israel	KX3	6328	50	CW	ZS6BKW	40
ZL3IO	13-Oct-12	New Zealand	K2	8421	238	CW	ZS6BKW	40
HB9TNW	14-Oct-12	Switzerland	KX3	4554	38	CW	ZS6BKW	17
4J5A	15-Oct-12	Azerbaijan	K2	6360		CW	PAR-3015	30
3B9SP	15-Oct-12	Rodriguez Island	K2	10094	74	CW	ZS6BKW	17
J79WE	17-Oct-12	Dominica	KX3	1819	130	CW	PAR-3015	30
RI1ANF	17-Oct-12	Franz Josef Land	KX3	6761	169	CW	ZS6BKW	20
ZP5NT	24-Oct-12	Paraguay	KX3	4393	155	CW	PAR-3015	20
6V7S	24-Oct-12	Senegal	KX3	4349	89	CW	ZS6BKW	20
OH0V	27-Oct-12	Aland Islands	KX3	4603	32	SSB	ZS6BKW	20
OG3077F	27-Oct-12	Finland	KX3	4663	27	SSB	ZS6BKW	20
TF3CW	27-Oct-12	Iceland	KX3	3338	31	SSB	ZS6BKW	20
C6AZZ	31-Oct-12	Bahamas	KX3	767	150	CW	ZS6BKW	40
OM/HA6NL	5-Nov-12	Slovak Republic	KX3	4971	72	CW	ZS6BKW	40
D44TWO	8-Nov-12	Cape Verde	KX3	3783	94	CW	ZS6BKW	40
CN8KD	13-Nov-12	Morocco	KX3	4347	68	CW	ZS6BKW	40
LY2KO	17-Nov-12	Latvia	KX3	4864	35	CW	ZS6BKW	10
9Y4/DL7VOG	18-Nov-12	Trinidad & Tobago	KX3	2089	136	CW	ZS6BKW	40
HR9/WQ7R	19-Nov-12	Honduras	KX3	1348	105	CW	ZS6BKW	40
EL2LF	20-Nov-12	Liberia	KX3	4963	94	CW	ZS6BKW	40
PJ2/DL9FJ	22-Nov-12	Curacao	KX3	1713	148	CW	ZS6BKW	40
FM/KL7WA	22-Nov-12	Martinique	KX3	1868	130	CW	ZS6BKW	40
PJ7I	22-Nov-12	St Maarten	KX3	1601	129	CW	ZS6BKW	40
FS/K9NB	22-Nov-12	St Martin	KX3	1605	128	CW	ZS6BKW	40
CT7/OJ0M	23-Nov-12	Portugal	KX3	3995	61	CW	ZS6BKW	20
J6/N7QT	2-Dec-12	St. Lucia	K2	1910	131	CW	ZS6BKW	40